The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Anatoly99, PoboznyNeil, Hammerz75, SSLOBOD, Jayce
6,186 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 638 guests, and 130 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,534
Posts417,715
Members6,186
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 309
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 309
A libertarian sociological perspective on the issue.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/decoster/decoster35.html

Loathing Daycare
by Karen De Coster

Something unfashionable became fashionable during the early 1980's, and I'm not talking about greed, junk bonds, or Ronald Reagan. But rather, this is something that is truly detestable, yet is a part of American culture every bit as much as Saturday morning cartoons or Sunday church. The fad that I speak of is child daycare.

Daycare, slowly evolving throughout the 70's, became the rage of the 80's as two-income households became the norm in middle-class America. After all, during this time we watched tax rates creep upward and personal responsibility creep downward, while Mom trotted off to work, and Dad came home from his job and changed diapers and vacuumed carpets.

These days, what we are witnessing is the first full generation of daycare kids having grown up. This is a generation clearly lacking in virtue, morals, discipline, and classical education. We complain about this all the time; of how young people today � in general � are so disrespectful of adults and so culturally repulsive in their preferences, behavior and dress.

After all, what we observe is a generation full of baggy pants five sizes too big, frosted hair cut into bizarre twists, and body piercings, where kids, and not all of them so young, deform their faces and heads and private parts with two-dollar silver bits purchased in filthy backrooms. Tattoos, obnoxious and unfeminine, adorn our young women's bodies, making them look like backwater tramps straight out of long-term incarceration. The music they listen to, from Marilyn Manson to trash-rap, reveals that we have, indeed, raised a generation of humans that have little respect for the spirituality of life. The kids call this "individualism". I call it collective rubbish. What we now witness is daycare brats becoming adults.

I suppose parents thought little ill effect would come to their children as they dumped them, daily, into the hands of strangers, to be watched over, played with, and fed by these strangers at daycare centers that soon became substitute parents.

The picture of a typical daycare family is an absurd one: rising early, the house is bustling with stressed-out parents trying to get the children ready to be carted off, while they also grapple with their own preparations for work and the stress that already awaits them in their workplace. Amidst the stress of typical child antics in the morning, Mom is trying to clothe and feed everyone while she tries to clothe and feed herself for a power day at the office. Thinking about it, how much quality attention can the kids really get when Mom is wrapped up in preparing herself mentally for a long day at work or her meeting with the CFO?

The soccer Mom, as she is typically dubbed, speeds over to daycare, drops the kids off at 7am, and gets to the office by eight o'clock. Working until 6pm, Mom rips out of the office, having fallen behind in her work again today, but has no choice but to get to the daycare center to pick up the kids by 7pm, because Dad will be working late tonight. By the time she arrives home, the kids are restless, misbehaving, and it is 7:30 or so before Mom and the kids pile out of the Explorer and into the house.

Now, depending on the age of the kids and their bedtimes, Mom has approximately a couple of hours to spend with the kids. If dinner is prepared and cooked at home, then we can assume that most of that time is taken up doing just that, all at a frantic pace, because Mom is hungry and tired, Dad has just come home, and the kids are impatient.

Where, in all this commotion, can parents possibly find time to share themselves with their children? After cooking and eating? Or is that time taken up with housecleaning, fielding phone calls, maintaining the house, shopping, paying bills, and just plain getting one's bearings in order? And of course, this cycle repeats itself daily, as the children are left with what little time remains after all the necessary tasking is done.

These are horrible circumstances for any child to have to bear. Already, the kids experience stress and chaos as a normal part of their daily routine. Life's little enjoyments, like quiet-time and personal reflection are not even in the cards for kids growing up in this family disorder. And then, add to that the numerous planned activities like soccer, dance class, gymnastics, and hockey, and you have a family that is no longer the epitome of a family unit. Rather, they find themselves spread out, each covering his or her own individual activities, and coming together only under rare circumstances.

Now I know it is not always possible for a woman to stay home with the children, either because of economic circumstances or career choices. What I do know is that parents have choices to make regarding their children, choices that need to be made before bringing those children into the world. Parents are responsible for being attentive to their children, and raising them as best they can. They are responsible for providing them with the emotional and intellectual tools they will need to grow in the world. Only parents and close family can do that for a child, not the daycare centers.

At the daycare center, parents entrust their children to strangers; strangers that have provided them with a babysitting rate that was probably cheaper than the other daycare centers they visited upon. At these centers, young people who are paid low wages and who are, typically, poorly trained, usually provide the childcare. The childcare may be lax, it may be inattentive, or it may simply be abusive, but it may be difficult for parents to gauge the overall quality of the services.

In a typical daycare unit, there are numerous children with few supervisors. Whatever the laws for supervision may be, it is not sufficient to replace real parenting.

As a child, I placed a great premium on quiet-time and time spent alone indulging in my solo interests. Whether the order of the day was creating some new artwork or reading my books, or writing a story or listening to my records, it was something I found necessary for my peace of mind, and for the growth of my intellectual capabilities. After school, I remember running home as fast as I could and bursting into the house, heading straight for my room and all my little tasks that lay before me. It was as much fun planning those activities as it was doing them. I felt a sense of security and comfort, since I knew Mom was there, and therefore, everything was going to be all right. I ran home because I knew it was a place that I wanted to be. Now, kids don�t run home to Mom anymore, because they have the latchkey stopover that comes between school and home. The security of Mom may come hours after school is over. During the summer months, for me, it was a whole day of various things to do; things I wanted to do. I never could have survived a moment as a daycare kid.

Can one who grew up like I did even imagine living the chaos of the daycare center life? Gaggles of kids, some screaming and some crying, some fighting and some sick, all letting loose in an atmosphere void of parents, control, or set discipline. Even if there exists a sense of discipline, where can a child get any peace, for instance, to read or write or study, or to develop artistic or musical talents?

There is no peace, for a daycare kid is trapped in a ritual of group games, group projects, and group trips. The activities are planned, as are lunchtime and naptime. Solo time, however, is not planned because it does not exist. A child is forced into this groupthink whether he likes it or not. He has no access to his own "things", his own comforts that he chooses, or his own hobbies. He's there to be babysat and to go along with the rest of the group on its little projects, no matter how uninteresting he may find them. And he is expected to do that for eight, ten, twelve hours a day, every day.

What happens to a high-IQ child who is squeezed into this environment daily, as his time revolves around activity after activity set around a group? How does the child become nurtured to use his God-given gifts? He doesn't, you can bet. In the groupthink atmosphere of childcare, the bright child is dumbed down to the lowest common denominator in the group, and he is not allowed to go off independent of the group and think as he might, do as he might, and create as he wants.

I know if I had grown up in this hellish environment, I may have been part of the whole body-piercing, tattooing thing out of a lack of respect for anyone, let alone myself. It's an awful environment to put kids in, and yet, expect them to come out of it behaving as respectable and civilized adults.

The daycare-oriented society, instead, nurtures fiends that hang in groups � at the malls, at the schools, in techno clubs, drug-and-sex parties, and in the streets. They look like bums and they sniff glue, poisonous solvents, and suck in helium to get their kicks. They take ecstasy to remove themselves from reality and listen to creep music to display their own unhappiness.

It's likely that this generation, and those to follow, can not nurture great scholars and thinkers like Lord Acton or Lysander Spooner. Besides the fact that the education system is a shambles, we adults cannot expect kids to grow unless we give them the time and space to do it. In the daycare environment into which parents thrust their children, there is no space and there is no opportunity for personal growth. There is only a low-paid babysitter who sticks you in the midst of the growth pattern of a dozen other kids. It's almost like raising kids has become akin to raising rabbits or hamsters.

We must stop to ask what has led people to make these decisions to treat their kids like that. What is it that has superceded the raising and nurturing of their children? The answer is, dependency on the Nanny State.

After all, the State has fostered a certain dependency upon the population; a dependency that finds people unwilling to be responsible for the education and nurturing of their own children. Parents have become so accepting of a routine that allows them to shove their children off to the free public school each day, they don't stop to think for a moment that any of it is really their responsibility. Along with that has come the government school's free-lunch programs, free breakfasts, after-school group activities to keep kids out of the parent's hair, and of course, latchkey. All of this serves to sway parents into thinking that the State is more able than the parents to provide for kids and their needs. Daycare, even if it is privatized business, came along as an extension of those attitudes.

Parents have simply got to take responsibility for the rearing of their own children, and they have got to be willing to sacrifice their own wants in order to do so. Their priorities need to shift from satellite dishes, two new cars, and houses full of electronics, to a more attentive environment in which kids can have their abilities nourished and realize their intellectual potential.

Life isn't easy, and it surely is not made any easier by a parasitic government that robs every family of independence through criminal tax rates, redistribution schemes, and regulatory madness. However, when parents claim economic excuses for the lack of attention to their children, it is pointless. After all, parents aren't forced to have children. It's a decision that needs much forethought before the action is taken to bring babies into the world. The children are a priority that has to be put ahead of everything else.

Let's start raising our own children, whatever it takes. Keep them out of the hands of State educators and replacement parents. For God sakes, give them a chance to lead a fruitful life.

August 8, 2001

Karen De Coster [send her mail] is a politically incorrect CPA, and an MA student in economics at Walsh College in Michigan.

Copyright � 2001 LewRockwell.com

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
As an Orthodox admirer of the Catholic Church, I want to say that your communion has done admirable work to give parents the option they feel best.

I live two blocks from a Catholic parish day care center and Catholic parishes or Catholic charities form one of the largest sponsors of child care. The most recent to open was blessed by the Cardinal. The Catholci community does yeoman's service in making day care an option for those who need and choose it, particular lower income and Spanish speaking families.

On the same time, the Church has been very supportive of efforts to allow parents to stay at home in the period after birth or adoption of a child. The Catholic Conference was quite helpful working with the White House in 1998 to begin allowing states to expand their social insurance to cover time taken off to care for children. Thanks to paid maternity/paternity leave, (something most historically Catholic countries hav long had) we might make this choice a real option.

Unfortunately, big business and conservative political organizations have blocked this in most states. On another track, the Catholic Conference has been working with Rep. Carolyn Maloney (NY) and Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton (NY) to at least give paid maternity/paternity leave to those who work for the federal government.

I am sure all of us, of whatever faith, who hope families can make the decision that is best for them without undue material burdens, applaude the Bishops for their efforts on this matter.

Axios

We have no reason not to believe that both St. Joseph and St. Mary were with Jesus during his childhood. In fact, as recently as a century ago, almost all fathers were stay at home dads.

Nevertheless, while I am not incline dto address mothers negatively as to the choice they make, I do support initiatives to allow them to spend the time after

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,075
Axios,

90% of dads may have been stay at home, but they were still out on the field while mom was in the house with the kids, or milking the cow, etc.

Look I'm not coming at this from a dogmatic point of view. I am coming at this from an "I love kids and want what's best for THEM point of view." I'm sure there are sincere people who think daycare is best. I just think they're sincerely wrong. I'm also not against taking your kids to preschool or organized institutional play groups, as long as the mother is available and as long as it is not too long per week (which I would leave up to the mother and father's discretion).

I agree that political conservatives here do thwart pro-worker legislation. I am a republican but I don't like what my party does regarding that issue.

In Christ,

anastasios

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Quote
Axios,
90% of dads may have been stay at home, but they were still out on the field while mom was in the house with the kids, or milking the cow, etc.

Look I'm not coming at this from a dogmatic point of view. I am coming at this from an "I love kids and want what's best for THEM point of view." I'm sure there are sincere people who think daycare is best. I just think they're sincerely wrong. I'm also not against taking your kids to preschool or organized institutional play groups, as long as the mother is available and as long as it is not too long per week (which I would leave up to the mother and father's discretion).

I agree that political conservatives here do thwart pro-worker legislation. I am a republican but I don't like what my party does regarding that issue.

In Christ,

anastasios

When I read your post too quickly the first time, I thought you said the mother was in the house milking the cows!!!!

But I don't think we can pass over to glibly the situation in the past century. Pa's trips to the field, Ma's trips into town or the barn or henhouse, etc. are not significant in the general situation that both parents were at home with the kids. (then you have that period between harvest and planting). At the dawn of the industrial revolution, the first factory workers were women. Men stayed home to farm the field and women went to work in lace factories, etc. The Church's response was not women away from their children, but some concern as to their 'purity' away from the home.

Later, as industrial work expanded, it was the men drawn to the factories and the Catholic Church did begin to raise concerns on the effect of this on family life. A certain admirable, but romanticist Catholic element (Dorothy Day certain falls somewhat in this tradition) condemed industrialization as a whole and said every Christian should go back to the farm or craftsman/artisan's workshop. (The Amish also stand in this tradition).

As to today's situation, I guess just a couple points. Would you not have to agree that if you think day care is sincerely wrong, that your Church is facilating alot of wrong by sponsoring day care centers?

Second, and I think we agree here. The problem is not "feminism" but capitalism*, right? One year of paid maternity/paternity leave would give parents the ability to spend that first year with their child. Other nations manage to do this; it is not impossible for the USA to do the same.

Axios


* or 'the current economic order, if you prefer.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 769
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 769
"If someone really really can't afford it and both parents (or the single parent) works, well I am not going to judge them; that's their lot in life. But people know, and I'll wager the Church teaches, that a father and a mother together, with a full-time child in the home with the kids, is the best way to have stable families. Look around."

I think that this is an exagerration. Many of the so-called "stay at home moms" I know are stay at home because the employment that they can obtain outside the home would not cover the costs of child care. As a result, the Dads often work crazy hours -- 60 plus per week -- to be able to afford to live in the Washington area, in a neighborhood with good schools, on one income. The result: Mom is totally frazzled due to taking care of the kids nonstop, and Dad virtually never sees the kids. Great solution.

In the past, things were different because people lived close to their parents and extended families, and there were always childcare options available -- ie, relatives. Nowadays, many/most people do not live near their extended families, and so the option of "staying at home" is not nearly as idyllic as its idealistic supporters would portray.

Things are expensive today, and some metro areas are simply more expensive than others -- so should we all move to Steubenville Ohio or Mississippi? Most of the two-income couples I personally know in my neighborhood and in my workplace do it because they need the money to live. The ones who do it the other way have the lopsided working hours, because they still need the same money to live as the folks who do it with two incomes -- ie, someone has to make the money needed to pay the mortgage, buy the food, educate the children, and so forth. And if there is some extra income so that the children can go to a better school or not have to pay for college, I don't believe that this is a bad thing.

I'm not a fan of day-care centers, and so we have never used them. There are other child care options that are more kid-friendly, however (but more expensive, admittedly), and our son absolutely loved his childcare situation, and, in fact, never complained about it once.

"One futher point: I used to think it'd be okay if the guy stayed home with the kids all the time and the mom worked. If that's the only option, fine. But after being married now, I can honestly say that there is no way a man can nurture and care for a child THE SAME WAY that a mother can. It's not our natural role."

I disagree with this completely. Nursing, yes, Mama does that. Other things really depend on the relationship between the father and the child. And when the Dad is away 60 hours per week, there isn't much of one to begin with, frankly, which leads to an even more lopsided relationship between kids and their mothers, and the relative marginalization of fathers from the lives of their children. Frankly, both mom and dad should work less so that they can both spend time with their children in a more equal setting -- rather than the lopsided relationships I have seen in the stay-at-home scenario.

Women have many gifts to bring to the world. They should not be limited to simply being at home with the children. For many women, as much as they love their children, this does not lead to a satrisfying life, and frankly not a life in which the gifts they have been given -- intellectual, artistic, etc. -- can be used to the capacity in which they were given them. To relegate women to one role in life -- as important as that role is -- is nevertheless to exclude the remainder of the gifts that a woman has been given, and I don't agree with that.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,196
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,196
Thank you Brendan!

Anastasios, I respect you and your opinion, but it's a gross misjudgement to assume that because you do not have the temperament to stay home with your kids that no man does, and that all women do. It just isn't so. Personally **I** do not have that temperament either, and last time I looked, I did not own a Y chromosome.

We believe strongly that *OUR* children should be cared for by family, and especially in the first two years, "family" means "parent." Note I say "parent," not "mother" or "father." My husband cannot bear a child, nor can he lactate, but that doesn't mean he can't take care of a baby or a kid - I might add with more patience and more talent than I. Meantime, I do my best to support our family. It works for us.

Lord knows I would LOVE a bigger house (we live in 789 sq feet + basement) a car that didn't have 189,000 miles on it (we take those blessings on St. Elias' feast day seriously) but I know that our kids are OK.

Mind you, should anything ever happen to me, or to my husband, we couldn't do this, because in the United States, families are not encouraged or supported. My kids WOULD have to go to public school, and probably to some sort of daycare.

Perhaps instead of saying "Mom should stay home" (unless she's on welfare) more energy should be put toward making child care decent, available and affordable, paying child care workers a living wage, providing meaningful PAID maternity leave like they do in the civilized world - oh and while we're at it, providing legal protection for women who breastfeed in public, and for women who pump their milk at work because they HAVE to work, but they also refuse to feed their baby corn syrup and chemicals from a can.

I guess my priorities are screwed up.


Sharon

Sharon Mech, SFO
Wife to a SAHD and Mama Bear to three kids
Cantor, sinner, LACTIVIST
sharon@cmhc.com

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1
O
Member
Member
O Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,595
Likes: 1
As I so often do I've sat back herre reading and saying nowt but I have to say that I sympathise with working parents .

I was one - but managed to wait till daughter number one could go to Nusery School - and she was ready for it - she had two and a half years at home with me - then I went back to College and then daughter number 2 came on the scene as a result of as rather nasty health problem.

My worry then was that Felicity would lose her Nursery place and therefore resent the new baby - did not happen the Education Dept, who at that time ran the Nursery Schools, were sympathetic to the problem and she stayed there till she started 'big' school at 5

So in fact both girls had my undivided attention for large parts of the day.

However that has not worked for Felicity - her 2 sons and daughter have been cared for by her husband as Felicity has the good job so Malcolm has been carer to all 3 kids - and a good job he has made of it - but financially it has been very hard.

As Brendan said it was easier when there was the extended family support available - but this is now less and less possible. I think every family has to try and do the best they can - if it means full time day care - then so be it - you just have to try and get the best quality care you can, and give as much love to the children outside those times - remembering that love is not always material things wink

Not an easy problem to solve - and you have to realise that with the best will in the world and the best precautions you can take , things can still go wrong. Each case has to be looked at on an individual basis.

Sorry - off the soap box

Angela

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 788
Always good to hear from the women.

Axios

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0