The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
everynameitryistak, DavidLopes, Anatoly99, PoboznyNeil, Hammerz75
6,188 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (EasternChristian19), 778 guests, and 95 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,537
Posts417,735
Members6,188
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#188178 02/08/02 07:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
T
Member
Member
T Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
A friendly forum member nicely e-mailed me yesterday asking why I joined specifically Russian Orthodoxy. As a forum co-moderator recently threw this in my face, and never has manfully answered my challenge to same, here is the gist of my answer.

First I would like to say I fully realize that an exclusive Russianness is no substitute for real Catholicity (universality), no more than exclusive Byzantineness nor exclusive Romanness or Roman-centeredness are.

In my life offline it invariably has been non-Byzantine people, never Byzantines themselves, who have told people like me, "You don't belong there — you're not _____'. Nasty remarks like "gr�cophile transritualist' and "post-Irish RC turned “Russian”' coming from putative Byzantines is entirely new to me. (Not being Irish myself, I can only imagine a "postmodern' St Patrick's Day party would have some cool multicultural fusion-type bands and dance music. Rock the house, boyo.)

The Russian version 'grabbed' me while Greek or Arabic (comparably large traditions) did not because:

1. Russians are northern Europeans so culturally that version seems closer to what I was used to than Greek or Arabic (both of which seem more exclusively ethnic and I had been told such about the Greeks — more about the Arabs below). Like Bishop Kallistos writes about that music: it is immediately appealing to Western ears.

It's a vast culture one can adopt and immerse oneself in — as I like to say, I am on longtime-acquaintance terms with the language — yet at the same time non-ethnic members seem more welcome to join here than perhaps the other two traditions. Like being adopted by a big family. Please pass me the голубцы (stuffed cabbage).

2. Yet at the same time, juxtaposed with American culture it can be very appealingly countercultural/alterna-cultural, unlike the Americanized, liberalized Greek-American culture that often votes pro-abortion, etc. (Dukakis, Tsongas, Snowe, Sarbanes, the unelected Stephanopoulos — "vote for me, I'm Greek!' Uh, no.)

Both accessible and challenging at the same time!

Why didn't you pick from Greek Orthodoxy or Ukrainian Orthodoxy?

See my answer above regarding Greek Orthodoxy in practice (not to be confused with Greek Orthodoxy as such). I am not sure why I didn't seek out specifically Ukrainian Orthodoxy. Perhaps the vastness of the Russian people and Church spoke to me in a way similar to the comprehensiveness of Roman Catholicism. Or, putting it another way, the Russian jurisdictions seemed less exclusively ethnic/nationalistic, less closed to those born outside?

I first experienced Byzantine worship thanks to Ukrainian Catholics.

Early on, and I'm talking about 19 years ago, I assumed from my experiences with Ukrainian Catholics that most Ukrainians were this and not Orthodox, which I now know isn't the case. Here in America, it seems both Ukrainian Catholics and Russian Orthodox are more prominent than exclusively Ukrainian-identified Orthodox churches.

I also was unaware at first that there is an Arabic Orthodox tradition, let alone that one part of it, the Antiochians, have been bending over backwards in recent years to extend themselves beyond their traditional ethnic borders. Sorry, Metropolitan Philip (a very kind man, I understand) — the Russians beat you to me.

I have read your site and I haven't pieced it quite together. If Russian Orthodoxy has its roots in Kyiv, why not go to a Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

Because I see the three countries of Rus' - Russia, Ukraine and Belarus - as essentially one (like Solzhenitsyn does), I never have seen my affiliation as a 'diss' of Kiev/Kyiv. As my friend put it, Russian Orthodoxy has its roots there.

Ukrainian Orthodoxy as such is really a modern thing, a late flower dating only from the 20th century. Kievan/Kyivan Orthodoxy, as in medieval times, was before there was any Russian vs. Ukrainian national rivalry.

I have never met a convert to Ukrainian Orthodoxy except for Ukr. Catholics.

That may be owing to a nationalistic character found in both Churches.

On a side note I enjoy your site and reading your posts on the Byzcath site.

Thanks!

Thanks for your time and service to the Church.

You're welcome!

http://oldworldrus.com

[ 02-08-2002: Message edited by: Serge ]

#188179 02/08/02 11:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Bless me a sinner, Reader Sergius!

A wonderful reflection on your Russian Orthodox spiritual identity and commitment!

For me, the wonderful thing about the Eastern Churches is precisely that they are truly inculturated in their respected and broader cultural contexts going over hundreds of years.

To belong to an Orthodox Church is also to belong to the culture in which it was incarnated the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

As a student of cultural identity, I see it as a dynamic thing that transcends mere biological bonds.

In Ukrainian history, some of our greatest benefactors have been non-Ukrainians who became so by adoption and ethusiasm and spent their lives in service to the Ukrainian people.

Many saints of Russian Orthodoxy are like that, Russian or East Slavic by adoption, such as St Procopius of Ustiug, a German, St Moses the Hungarian of the Kyiv Caves etc.

We in the West have compartmentalized religion apart from cultural identity etc.

To be Russian Orthodox today in Russia, from my observations, is to be strongly Russian in terms of cultural nationalism and also monarchistic. That's just the way it is, so far anyway.

Kyiv and the Kyivan Church is the Mother to other Churches, including the Russian Church. The Saints of Russia are also the Saints of Kyiv and the Ukrainians have no monopoly here.

You are truly a Kyivan Orthodox Christian, Reader Sergius, and I embrace you as such as a brother!

If you have Celtic blood in your veins, as I do, then we are both spiritually related to the early Celtic missionaries who travelled to Kyiv to see St Olha the Great and established missions there.

I would also say, and you would probably disagree with me, but that's O.K., that while Ukrainian cultural identity as we know it developed over time and solidified only in the last couple of hundred years, so too did Russian identity, the Russian version of Old Slavonic etc.

But we all share in the spiritual heritage of Kyivan Rus', its glorious achievements and its great promise for the future.

Alex


Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0