1 members (theophan),
908
guests, and
93
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums26
Topics35,534
Posts417,717
Members6,186
|
Most Online4,112 Mar 25th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 18
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 18 |
I believe it traces its root to the middle ages, had something to do with distribution of land or some such. St. Paul encouraged it in one of his epistles, but he never said it should be a requirement. It is well known that many of the apostles, including St. Peter himself, were married.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24
Moderator Member
|
Moderator Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337 Likes: 24 |
MDunn,
If you are Latin Catholic you have zero chance of changing sui iuris churches and getting ordained a priest. If you are Greek Catholic you may have a chance if you are willing to drop everything and enroll in Seminary, if not you have zero chance.
Fr. Deacon Lance
My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131 |
I have heard that the Archeparchy of Pittsburgh of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic Church will not ordain married men to the priesthood. And where did you hear that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,131 |
...The "culture shock" is seldom easy. In addition several hierarchs have burned their fingers, so to speak - I'm thinking of a specific case (never mind where) whose goal was to be ordained a married priest by one of our hierarchs, then obtain bi-ritual faculties, and serve for the Latins! For this one of our bishops should stick his neck out? ... Worth asking: How many of "our people" are knocking on the door of the bishops office, with wife in tow, asking about this for themselves?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 Likes: 1 |
The question is certainly interesting, but I've no data with which to answer it. So I'll ask a question of my own: does your reference to "our people" mean the Irish?
Fr. Serge
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231
Member
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,231 |
...The "culture shock" is seldom easy. In addition several hierarchs have burned their fingers, so to speak - I'm thinking of a specific case (never mind where) whose goal was to be ordained a married priest by one of our hierarchs, then obtain bi-ritual faculties, and serve for the Latins! For this one of our bishops should stick his neck out? ... Worth asking: How many of "our people" are knocking on the door of the bishops office, with wife in tow, asking about this for themselves? Another question: How often do you hear from the "powers that be" that married Ruthenian Greek Catholic men could be ordained priests and are encouraged to consider it? Deacons? Yes, but priests? Never heard it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 442
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 442 |
Dear Father Serge, I ask for your blessing,
Could you please tidy up your PM mailbox so I can send you a message?
In Christ: Converted Viking
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 638 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 638 Likes: 1 |
Hmmm, the experience for Latins doesn't really happen in Australia. There are 2 married ex-Latins who have been ordained in the Ukrainian Church (I think its 2 at least). I've asked the Melkites about Latins changing rite, marrying in the Melkite Church, and then subsequently being ordained priests and they seem to be fine with it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 16
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 16 |
I'd have to agree with Collin, although I don't totally disagree with Deacon Lance. I think, perhaps, it might be better said that it is not an easy road and one unlikely to be successfully traversed if the change of Ritual Church is perceived as having been solely or principally motivated by the intent to bypass the Latin celibacy rule.
It seems to me that any married man translating from the Latin Church to an Eastern Church can likely expect that consideration of him as a viable presbyteral candidate would not be favorably considered until he has spent some time in the Eastern Church, subsequent to the time of having made the change. And, by some time, I would ordinarily anticipate a period of a few years.
It would certainly not be something that I'd encourage anyone to list among the reasons for seeking to change canonical enrollment. However, by that, I'm not suggesting that married men considering a change who sincerely believe they are called to the altar should lie by omission in not so stating. Rather, I believe that it may well be premature to commit to that intent until one has experienced the spiritual life of his new Church as a layperson and more fully embraced it than he ordinarily could hope to do while discerning the transfer itself.
Many years,
Neil
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 439
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 439 |
As Neil says, the bishops are wary of people changing rites with the sole goal of being ordained a priest in the rite of transfer.
You must really love your new rite. It must be part of your spirituality. The culture of the new Church must become your culture.
They will ordain someone to the priesthood who will be a shepherd to their people within their own Church, not someone who will always long for the Latin rite of their birth and upbringing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 638 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 638 Likes: 1 |
Indeed. So very true. Changing rite simply for the sheer pleasure of running away from your birth rite is not the Christian way. Running away is not the Christian way. You have to be at peace with your birth rite before you choose to transfer rites. Only then will it work out.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 18
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 18 |
What Im getting from all this, aside from Fr. Deacon Lance, is that if I switch rites for anything other then wanting to be an Eastern Catholic, Im in the wrong. I agree with that sentiment whole heartedly
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 638 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 638 Likes: 1 |
Well, there's nothing wrong for someone from the Latin Rite to desire priesthood in the Eastern Rite. However, a married state or a desire to be a married priest is not a primary motivation to switch to the Eastern Rite. As we are all partakers of the divine nature, the most important thing is to be a part of the community first, and attend Liturgy frequently as possible. Getting involved is a key step.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 16
Global Moderator Member
|
Global Moderator Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,090 Likes: 16 |
Well, there's nothing wrong for someone from the Latin Rite to desire priesthood in the Eastern Rite. However, a married state or a desire to be a married priest is not a primary motivation to switch to the Eastern Rite. As we are all partakers of the divine nature, the most important thing is to be a part of the community first, and attend Liturgy frequently as possible. Getting involved is a key step. Well said, Collin! Many years, Neil
"One day all our ethnic traits ... will have disappeared. Time itself is seeing to this. And so we can not think of our communities as ethnic parishes, ... unless we wish to assure the death of our community."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 Likes: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,564 Likes: 1 |
Dear Viking,
I await your PM!
Fr. Serge
|
|
|
|
|