The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
PittsburghBob, Jason_OLPH, samuelthesearcher, Hannah Walters, Harry Kevin
6,196 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 391 guests, and 146 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,542
Posts417,783
Members6,196
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,930
Mayo Clinic Doctor Admits Abortions Hurt Women, Cause Premature Births

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 20, 2009

Add to My Yahoo! Email RSS Print

Rochester, MN (LifeNews.com) -- A physician who works for the prestigious Mayo Clinic has written a new factsheet that admits abortions harm women. Roger W. Harms, M.D., a Mayo Clinic obstetrician and medical editor-in-chief, also says abortions can cause women problems with subsequent pregnancies.

The Mayo Clinic posted Dr. Harms' new factsheet, with the title "Does it affect subsequent pregnancies?" on August 6.

Harm says there are definitely cases when physicians see "an abortion cause problems in a subsequent pregnancy."

"During a surgical abortion, the fetus is removed from the uterus — often with a vacuum device, a syringe or a spoon-shaped instrument with a sharp edge (curette) — as an outpatient surgical procedure," Harms explains.

In some cases, "a surgical abortion may weaken the cervix or cause scarring on the inside of the uterus."

"If such damage occurs, surgery may be needed to correct the problems before a woman can conceive again or carry a subsequent pregnancy to term," he said.

Canadian researcher Brent Rooney says the information is important for women who are considering abortions because a weak cervix can lead to premature birth in subsequent pregnancies and that can lead to problems for future unborn children, such as cerebral palsy.

"The more prematurely a baby is born, the higher his cerebral palsy risk," Rooney tells LifeNews.com today. "Those born before 32 weeks' gestation have 55 times the cerebral palsy risk as full-term (at least 37 weeks' gestation) newborns."

"When the 'gate' (i.e. cervix) to a woman's womb is weak (i.e. 'incompetent cervix'), it will open too early during the pregnancy leading to a preterm birth," he explained. "Thus, when [Harms] admits that surgical abortions can weaken a women's cervix, [he] implicitly conceded that surgical abortions boost the risk of a 'preemie' having cerebral palsy."

Although such a risk is rare, Rooney says it is important given that one in every 410 children born in the United States are later diagnosed with the condition.

In 2007, Rooney teamed up with Dr. Byron Calhoun and Dr. Elizabeth Shadigian and, in a study, estimated that, in 2002, there were 1,096 newborns under 32 weeks' gestation whose cerebral palsy was caused by their mother's prior induced abortions. [1]

Rooney says Harms' acknowledgement of the abortion-premature birth risk is not new and that it and its effects have been known for decades.

"Is the abortion-preemie risk recently discovered? Hardly, since it was first reported in a 1963," he said. "In 2006 and 2007 the very prestigious Institute of Medicine in a massive textbook listed 'First trimester induced abortion' as an 'Immutable Medical Risk Factor Associated with Preterm Birth."

Numerous studies have shown the abortion-premature birth link.

Most recently, Dr Robbert van Oppenraaij presented his findings before the collegium of scientists in June at the annual European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Amsterdam.

He says one induced abortion raises the risk of premature birth in a next pregnancy by 20 percent.

Two or more abortions raises the risk by 90 percent and doubles the risk of a very premature birth, at 34 weeks or less.

"It can be concluded that a history of abortion is associated with an increased risk for premature delivery and very premature delivery," he said.

Those numbers present a grave problem given that the repeat abortion rate in some nations, such as the United States and England -- is 40 to 50 percent or more. That means millions of women and children around the globe are at risk of premature birth because of having an abortion.

1 Calhoun BC, Shadigian E, Rooney B. Cost Consequences of Induced Abortion as an Attributable Risk for Preterm Birth and Informed Consent. J Reprod Med 2007;52(10):929-937

http://www.lifenews.com/nat5381.html

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Another factor in the rise of sick babies who need Levels I-III neonatal care are the multiples from IVF. (My mother-in-law is a neonatal nurse practishioner and told me that last time I visited.)

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
As tragic as the results of prenatal infanticide are to later siblings, using them for argument poses its own problem: the evil of killing the child comes not from collateral effects, but from the evil of killing *that* child.

Raising this type of argument is counterproductive, as it offers the proponents of this genocide a side issue to argue against . . .

hawk

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
Member
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,214
In that case a logical response would be the pursuit of a 'safer' form of infanticide.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
D
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 4
The reasoning of Roe v. Wade would indeed show a right to not be prosecuted for post-natal infanticide, even to the age of a couple of years . . .

Then again, the argument for a constitutional "right" to same sex marriage applies equally and identically to marriage for other than two, uh, partners. frown

hawk


Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0