The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
PoboznyNeil, Hammerz75, SSLOBOD, Jayce, Fr. Abraham
6,185 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 638 guests, and 89 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,533
Posts417,712
Members6,185
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
What is the mainstream Eastern opinion on the sinlessness of the Old Testament saints? I'm thinking here specifically of Enoch and Elijah. Are they considered never to have committed any personal sins whatsoever? Does the Eastern tradition speculate on how it was possible for them to triumph over the condition of sinfulness into which they were born? How does their sinlessness compare to John the Baptist and the Virgin Mary?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
I had never heard that any saint was sinless (with the exception of the All-Holy, All-Pure, Blessed and Glorious Theotokos and Ever-Virgin Mary). It would run counter to all of the texts of the funeral services, which repeatedly remind us "that there is not a man who does not sin in thought, or word, or deed".

Indeed, most of the saints would probably protest loudly against any intimation that they were without sin--particularly the Desert Fathers.

Last edited by StuartK; 09/09/10 02:13 PM.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
It is a matter of speculation as to the nature of Mary and sin. I don't think there is any settled opinion. I have never heard of Elijah, Enoch or John the Baptist being considered sinless.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
There is no speculation on the sinlessness of Mary. The hymnography of the Church and its liturgical texts all state clearly that Mary is All-Holy, All-Pure, etc. etc. The East and West both agree on this, but the West insists on providing an explanation as to why, whereas the East just accepts it as a mystery.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
I can only say, that as I member of an Orthodox Church, I have read and heard various opinions such as the one held by Metropolitan Hierotheos. I am of course also familiar with the hymns. I respectfully stick by my statement.

Last edited by AMM; 09/09/10 05:05 PM.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
In his book *The Friend of the Bridegroom*, Sergius Bulgakov explicitly asserts the personal sinlessness of John the Baptist and compares him to the Theotokos, "who is free of all personal sin and even of any sinful inclination. And in the view of the Church, which venerates his saintliness from the moment of his conception, the Forerunner too is free of personal sin. ... Because they participate in the human essence, the Mother of God and the Forerunner also possess in a fundamental property or state of this essence: they are subject to original sin and death. But this condition that is common to the whole human race, hamartema, is not actualized in them by particular, personal sins, parabaseis, paraptomata. It is suppressed and vanquished by their personal freedom" (p. 20).

I do not have the impression that Bulgakov was asserting anything novel but rather the long-standing tradition in the Eastern Churches.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
Gotta be careful with Bulgakov, Father. Sometimes his opinions are his alone, sometimes they reflect the tradition of one particular Orthodox Church, but not all.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
J
jjp Offline
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by AMM
I can only say, that as I member of an Orthodox Church, I have read and heard various opinions such as the one held by Metropolitan Hierotheos. I am of course also familiar with the hymns. I respectfully stick by my statement.

I have contemplated this a lot recently, and used to believe as you did.

You say you are familiar with the praise of Mary's sinlessness incorporated throughout the liturgy. What is it you think when you sing these words?

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
I actually didn't state any belief of my own. I simply said there is variable opinion. All of which just means there are different interpretations of what spotless means, and no exact settled opinion. I believe I am perfectly comfortable with that ambiguity.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
J
jjp Offline
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
As I understand it, "spotless" is agreed to mean without sin. The difference in Orthodox thought, again as I understand it, is when/how this spotlessness happened. Conception, birth, Annunciation, etc.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
Quote
The difference in Orthodox thought, again as I understand it, is when/how this spotlessness happened. Conception, birth, Annunciation, etc.

Or maybe we just don't care that much about the "how"?

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
J
jjp Offline
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
Yeah, that's kinda what I mean. The lack of a desire for dogmatic specificity leads to differing interpretations.

But I was questioning AMM in whether this ambiguity extends all the way to the very meaning of spotlessness, as opposed to when it may have happened.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
No, it does not. You will not find any reputable Orthodox hierarch or theologian who would endorse the idea that Mary sinned in any way. I have never run across any book of Orthodox theology that endorsed the notion that she had. It is not an acceptable theologumenon, even if, in their day, certain of the Fathers, including John Chrysostom, speculated that she had.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
F
Member
Member
F Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 157
I just posted this article over at the Orthodox Christianity forum. Thought you all might find it of interest:

The Sinlessness of the Theotokos and John the Baptist [orthodoxchristianity.net]

I welcome your reflections.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
A
AMM Offline
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,411
Quote
But I was questioning AMM in whether this ambiguity extends all the way to the very meaning of spotlessness, as opposed to when it may have happened.

Those two are part of the same question.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0