The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Sergiusz, zeroneet, Atomic Parakeet 1, Anna777, HeraclitusTheObscu
5,830 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
2 members (Adamcsc, akemner), 62 guests, and 19 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Byzantine Nebraska
Byzantine Nebraska
by orthodoxsinner2, December 11
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,141
Posts414,752
Members5,830
Most Online3,380
Dec 29th, 2019
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
D
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
OP Offline
Jessup B.C. Deacon
Member
D
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,346
Some insight on where he stands on the important "social" issues (traditional marriage, abortion,etc.). Dn. RJB

http://www.religionnews.com/politics/election/what-was-romney-like-as-a-mormon-bishop

What was Romney like as a Mormon bishop?
Shira Schoenberg / The Republican | Jul 26, 2012 |

(RNS) Lani Gerson left the Mormon Church long before Mitt Romney came to excommunicate her.

Gerson, 65, grew up in Arizona and left the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a teenager. When she moved to Cambridge, Mass., she began getting aggressive visitors from the church, urging her to return. She wrote to church officials asking them to stop contacting her.

One Sunday in 1982, she recalled, Romney, then a young bishop, and an assistant showed up at her doorstep inviting her to her excommunication trial.

“I was dumbfounded,” Gerson said. “I said to him, ‘I have already quit -- you can't fire me.’” Gerson said she had never before met Romney, and he did not try to engage her in conversation or discover her story.

“There was no curiosity on his part about who I was and what this was about,” Gerson said.

Typically, excommunication in the Mormon Church is rare and reserved for someone who fundamentally violates church tenets. Gerson, a Democrat, said her mother interceded with a church authority in Utah, and she does not know if the trial went forward.

The incident raises the question about Romney that has frequently come up in his campaign as the Republican candidate for president: Can Romney relate to the average person?

Those who interacted with him during his time as a church leader in Massachusetts give differing answers. Critics, often women, say Romney was insensitive, particularly on controversial issues like abortion and gay rights. Yet Romney’s close advisers say he showed enormous compassion, particularly to teenagers and those in need.

“When you say how did he respond to issues of abortion or same sex marriage or any other thing, he handled that in a very compassionate and loving way,” said Kenneth Hutchins, a retired Northborough police chief who took over as stake president after Romney.

Though Romney talks little about his faith on the campaign trail, he grew up in the Mormon Church and spent years as a top church leader in Massachusetts. From 1986 to 1994, he was president of the Boston stake, an entity similar to a Catholic diocese. Before that, Romney was bishop, similar to a lay pastor, of congregations in Belmont and Cambridge. Each job included both organizational work and counseling.

After leaving the stake president position, Romney taught Sunday school for a year, then oversaw the church’s programs for teenagers for around two years. Romney continues to tithe -- giving 10 percent of his income to his church. In accordance with Mormon teachings, he does not drink alcohol, tea or coffee. He attends church services when he can. Romney's campaign did not respond to requests for comment on this story.

As a church leader, Romney ran the church with businesslike efficiency.

“He was very serious about doing an excellent job about things and he didn’t suffer fools,” said Helen Claire Sievers, executive director for the Harvard-affiliated WorldTeach, who was active in the church when Romney was stake president.

But it is in his ability to relate to church members, particularly in areas touched by Mormonism’s strict ethical and moral code, that some find fault.

Carolyn Caci first spoke to Romney when he was a young bishop and she was a divorced mother of five in her 50s. Caci told Romney she was dating someone. “He went into his spiel about sex before marriage,” Caci said. “I said you’ve got to be kidding me. That’s none of your business.”

Caci does not hold it against Romney -- she later heard that he regretted his words.

She was not the only woman upset by Romney. A 1994 article in the Boston Phoenix told the story of an anonymous woman (who has since been identified) who wrote an article in a feminist Mormon magazine claiming Romney, as bishop, discouraged her from having an abortion even though her health was at stake. Romney later said he could not remember the incident.

In the Phoenix story, Judy Dushku, a professor of government at Suffolk University, and church member Evelyn Harvill said they urged Romney to speak out about domestic abuse, but Romney brushed off their concerns. Harvill, who did not respond to an emailed request for comment, told the Phoenix that Romney was an “elitist” who “surrounds himself in church with rich, powerful white men.”

Dushku said in an email that she found Romney “insensitive on many levels,” but declined to comment further, citing numerous media requests.

Another area where Romney was criticized was his attitude toward homosexuality. In July 1994, during Romney’s U.S. Senate campaign, The Boston Globe published a story saying that Romney, in a speech to a congregation of single Mormons, said he found homosexuality “perverse and reprehensible.” The story cited one named and three unnamed sources.

Romney denied the comments. "I specifically said they should avoid homosexuality and they should avoid heterosexual relations outside of marriage," Romney told the Globe then. "I did not use the words perverse or perversion. I just said it was wrong. … That is what my church believes."

Other church colleagues paint a different picture of Romney. Sievers said she convinced Romney to hold an evening for church women to talk about practices they felt could be changed.

For example, male church leaders typically went on monthly visits to speak at other congregations. The women suggested that female leaders could do the same.

“Mitt actually said yes, I don’t see why not,” Sievers recalled. “He was thoughtful about what’s practice and doctrine, what do I have authority to change. … I felt like Mitt cared more about the congregation than he did his potential career in the church.”

Sievers’ first interaction with Romney was when a member of the congregation owed her money. Romney helped her get the money back -- and offered to give her money himself.

“He spent an enormous amount of time talking to each of us that needed help,” Sievers said.

Romney counseled self-sufficiency, a theme he brings up today on the campaign trail.

Advisers said Romney had a particular interest in the congregation’s youth, and he was also concerned with making immigrants feel comfortable, helping establish branches of the church in urban, immigrant-filled areas.

Former parishioners say Romney organized efforts to help needy families. In one instance, documented in “The Real Romney,” a book by Boston Globe reporters Michael Kranish and Scott Helman, two boys from the church were paralyzed in an accident. Romney visited the family on Christmas Eve and gave the boys a stereo system and VCR. He offered to pay for the boys’ college tuitions, and continued to help the family for years.

Kranish and Helman reported that Romney was seen within the church as “warm, accessible, and a good listener.” “The Real Romney” records numerous instances where Romney helped church members: cooking for sick parishioners, organizing a brigade of people to save a family’s possessions from a house fire, knocking down a hornet’s nest for a friend with a broken foot.

Hutchins said when Romney was confronted with parishioners’ problems, Romney spent a “lot of prayer and introspection and pondering over those kinds of things. They weren’t taken lightly or dealt with lightly.”

(Shira Schoenberg writes for The Republican in Springfield, Mass.)


Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 1
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 1
I want someone who is insensitive in the White House. All this empathy and emotionalism has driven us to the brink of ruin.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 335
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 335
Stuart, I agree with you but I prefer the term "dispassionate." I'd also like someone in the White House who has real executive/management experience. The presidency is, after all, "the hardest job in the world" and the chief executive office in this vast and troubled land. While at it, it would sure be great to have someone who gets the whole "freedom of religion" issue, from a Constitutional perspective, and does not try to cram "gay marriage" and other kinds of social engineering down my throat or cause other offense to Christians.

Lord, have mercy on us!

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 1
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 1
Heaven knows, George Washington (let alone Thomas Jefferson) did not relate to the common person (or common man, as I prefer to call him). None of the Founders were egalitarians or populists, and none of them saw much value in cultivating the affections of "the mob". That's why they gave us a divided, republican government, rather than a popular democracy. They saw public service as a duty--a chore, really--to be done competently so one could go back home quickly and with honor unsullied. The job of legislators was to make laws in line with the Constitution; the job of the Chief Executive was to implement those laws, or to veto those which to his mind were either not consistent with the Constitution or in the public interest.

The very idea that they would be pressing the flesh at supermarkets or bars, let alone getting involved in popular entertainment ("Abe Lincoln on Oprah, next!") is absurd. And yet, for all that, they were also much more approachable than politicians today. Anyone could--and did--just walk into the White House on visiting hours. The lawns were public spaces where you might bump into the First Family. The Capitol was also open, and people could walk into the office of their representative or senator at will--even walk onto the floor when Congress was not in session. So, for all that the vertical distance between leaders and citizens was greater, the horizontal distance was much less. Politicians did not--could not--live in a bubble as they do today, and so, without pandering they did have a finger on the national pulse, did know the opinions of their constituents, and acted in accordance with those opinions to the extent it was also consistent with their best judgment and conscience.


Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2022 (Forum 1998-2022). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5