The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
Jayce, Fr. Abraham, AnonymousMan115, violet7488, HopefulOlivia
6,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (1 invisible), 678 guests, and 108 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,530
Posts417,671
Members6,182
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776
Likes: 24
U
Member
Member
U Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 776
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by DMD
Originally Posted by eastwardlean?
At some point, it'd be nice if we could agree to talk to each other, rather than past each other. Essential for dialogue.

Many of us do try to do just that.

Papa Franceso is leading the way and setting a good example for us all. Apparently the Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox representatives who've attended the Installation have been staying at the same residence as the pope, and he is having breakfast and dining with them daily. Did we ever think we'd see the day?

Table Talk [catholicnews.com]

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 209
E
Member
Member
E Offline
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 209
Originally Posted by Otsheylnik
I think the real reason for the tone of Met. Hilarion's remarks is that he is perceived by some Orthodox as being sympathetic to Greek Catholics; thus he goes in harder on them in public statements to prop up his internal reputation.

Interesting point, Otsheylnik. There are often multiple audiences behind what we say.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
J
jjp Offline
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
See above.
Anything in particular I should be sifting for?

The answer to your question.
I don't have any questions, as Met. Hilarion left none.
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Anything in particular I should be sifting for?

Are you talking in circles on purpose or does it just happen on accident??

Quote
Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
Because they would all be Ukranian Christians united in one church.
So all the Latin ordinaries will pack up and leave?

Why would they need to if they were part of the newly unified church?
Why are they there now, outside of the UGCC in their present unified communion with the "supreme authority of the church" they recognize in Pastor Aeternus?

You didn't answer my question.

Quote
Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
It seems all the complaining is that the ROC is too hot for some people, and it's not going to let cold water be thrown on it for someone else's idea of unity that was rejected back in 1441.
You don't have to read so much into it. What's the point of kicking out all the Catholics, Latin or otherwise, only to then unite with them after the fact? Let's call a spade a spade, unity to the Russians means becoming Orthodox, period.
The Fathers of the Ecumenical Councils set that standard: why should the Russians-or any Orthodox Catholic-abandon it?

You didn't answer my question.

Quote
Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
On the flip side... Give the Russians Ukraine in return for communion and call them all Catholic... Who cares? Keeping two ancient, holy and apostolic churches separated over a local spat is silly.
What local spat would that be?
The one we're talking about, Ukraine.
No spat: we're all agreed that at present Ukraine belongs to the Patriarchate of Moscow.

You aught to let Met. Hilarion in on that, otherwise his comments about expansion will seem awkwardly out of place.

Quote
Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
We don't believe in "two" apostolic churches, we confess the Faith in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
Then why the worry about canonical territories?
The good order of the Church (taxis) set up by the Apostles and Fathers.

Orthodox bicker about these issues all the time (OCA vis-a-vis the GOA and ROC) without breaking communion. That alone is no excuse here.

Quote
Originally Posted by jjp
Because you see only the Orthodox Church as the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and any outside of it (including other Orthodox) as outside the faith. Union, therefore, means coming to your side of the fence.

Again, let's just call a spade a spade, it makes things so much simpler.
I do nothing but, and I don't even have to ask Met. Gennadios.

That isn't what I suggested asking him.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
J
jjp Offline
Member
Member
J Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Likes: 5
Again, not necessarily picking bones with the Orthodox.

Let the Catholics give in to all arguments of "territory" and unite so that they made fade into one anyways.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by jjp
Are you talking in circles on purpose or does it just happen on accident??
I don't know: did you open your rabbit hole under Met. Gennadios' name on purpose?

Originally Posted by jjp
You didn't answer my question.
There is no answer to your question: within Orthodoxy all the bishops of Ukraine are under the Metropolitan of Kiev and All Ukraine, because they are in communion with him and the rest of Orthodoxy.

Under the Vatican, the Major Archbishop (who claims he is a patriarch, despite what his supreme pontiff says) has his bishops in Ukraine and elsewhere outside of Urkaine, there's a separate bishop in Zakarpatia directly under the Vatican, alongside a host of Latin bishops-including one for Kiev, and for good measure an Armenian bishop in L'viv under a catholicos in Lebanon, although they are all in communion with each other. If you want a justification/excuse for why that is (dis)organized, you will have to ask their "font of unity" for it.

Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
You don't have to read so much into it. What's the point of kicking out all the Catholics, Latin or otherwise, only to then unite with them after the fact? Let's call a spade a spade, unity to the Russians means becoming Orthodox, period.
The Fathers of the Ecumenical Councils set that standard: why should the Russians-or any Orthodox Catholic-abandon it?
You didn't answer my question.
Yes, I did. You just didn't like the answer.

Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
No spat: we're all agreed that at present Ukraine belongs to the Patriarchate of Moscow.
You aught to let Met. Hilarion in on that, otherwise his comments about expansion will seem awkwardly out of place.
Oh? What particular comments would seem "awkwardly out of place", as His Eminence points to expansion-or even the existence-of the UGCC as being "awkardly out of place."

Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
Then why the worry about canonical territories?
The good order of the Church (taxis) set up by the Apostles and Fathers.

Orthodox bicker about these issues all the time (OCA vis-a-vis the GOA and ROC) without breaking communion.

So did the Apostles and Fathers.
Originally Posted by jjp
That alone is no excuse here.
I gave you the reason. You will have to ask someone else for excuses. Do be specific as to what you want excused.


Originally Posted by jjp
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
Because you see only the Orthodox Church as the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and any outside of it (including other Orthodox) as outside the faith. Union, therefore, means coming to your side of the fence.

Again, let's just call a spade a spade, it makes things so much simpler.
I do nothing but, and I don't even have to ask Met. Gennadios.
That isn't what I suggested asking him.
I suggest you first tell us-spit it out-what a Metropolitan in Italy has anything to do with Ukraine: you are aware that they are two separate nations (and Churches), no?

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
I reiterate what I said earlier. I love the Orthodox Church. I am glad you are Orthodox. But why do you have to be such a jerk?

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by StuartK
I reiterate what I said earlier. I love the Orthodox Church. I am glad you are Orthodox. But why do you have to be such a jerk?
Is that addressed to Met. Hilarion?

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by StuartK
I reiterate what I said earlier. I love the Orthodox Church. I am glad you are Orthodox. But why do you have to be such a jerk?
Is that addressed to Met. Hilarion?

Come on all, it's Lent for all of us at least until tomorrow. wink Play nice.

Last edited by DMD; 03/22/13 09:20 AM.
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
E
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
Za myr z'wysot ...
Member
E Offline
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
Keeping two ancient, holy and apostolic churches separated over a local spat is silly.
What local spat would that be?
The same one as between the MP and the UOC-KP/UAOC.


Originally Posted by IAlmisry
We don't believe in "two" apostolic churches, we confess the Faith in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
True, the Church is one. This only means that these man-made divisions must cease.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 329
Member
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 329
I suggest you first tell us-spit it out-what a Metropolitan in Italy has anything to do with Ukraine: you are aware that they are two separate nations (and Churches), no?

Because it makes no sense to complain about Catholic impinging on Orthodox canonical territory while establishing churches in Rome, in London, etc.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by JBenedict
I suggest you first tell us-spit it out-what a Metropolitan in Italy has anything to do with Ukraine: you are aware that they are two separate nations (and Churches), no?

Because it makes no sense to complain about Catholic impinging on Orthodox canonical territory while establishing churches in Rome, in London, etc.
I'll hold off replying until jjp (the OP) answers.

But in the meantime, on London: you have heard of the Act of Supremacy, no?

Last edited by IAlmisry; 03/22/13 11:40 AM.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by Epiphanius
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by jjp
Keeping two ancient, holy and apostolic churches separated over a local spat is silly.
What local spat would that be?
The same one as between the MP and the UOC-KP/UAOC.
You mean UOC-MP and the rest of Orthodoxy. Exactly (don't forget the Pidhirtsi Fathers and their "Ukrainian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church" and the "Priestly Society of St. Josaphat" as well).

Originally Posted by Epiphanius
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
We don't believe in "two" apostolic churches, we confess the Faith in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
True, the Church is one. This only means that these man-made divisions must cease.
Exactly.

Last edited by IAlmisry; 03/22/13 11:47 AM.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 357
C
Member
Member
C Offline
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 357
It might be me, but it sounds like several people are calling for Syncretism.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
Quote
Is that addressed to Met. Hilarion?

No, that would be you, Isa. You not only deliberately go out of your way to annoy the Catholics, you also annoy your Orthodox brethren.

As for Metropolitan Hilarion, he has a job to do as foreign secretary of the Patriarch Synod of Moscow, so I would expect him to do no more or less than express the official position of the Church of Moscow.

You, however, consistently demonstrate a cavalier disregard for both truth and charity.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Is this ex cathedra?
Originally Posted by StuartK
Quote
Is that addressed to Met. Hilarion?

No, that would be you, Isa. You not only deliberately go out of your way to annoy the Catholics, you also annoy your Orthodox brethren.

As for Metropolitan Hilarion, he has a job to do as foreign secretary of the Patriarch Synod of Moscow, so I would expect him to do no more or less than express the official position of the Church of Moscow.

You, however, consistently demonstrate a cavalier disregard for both truth and charity.
Like this?
Originally Posted by Pavloosh
That Russian bishop is insane if he actually believes that the Pope will abandon the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.
What craziness! And he calls himself a Christian?

Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0