The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
everynameitryistak, DavidLopes, Anatoly99, PoboznyNeil, Hammerz75
6,188 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 865 guests, and 84 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,537
Posts417,734
Members6,188
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
IAlmisry #393398 04/17/13 01:08 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
L
Member
Member
L Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,405
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by Latin Catholic
There's a difference between the titles of "Patriarch" and "Catholicos." The difference is that "Patriarch" is a term used in the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (CCEO) and "Catholicos" is not. Therefore, from the point of view of CCEO, the title of "Catholicos" is not controversial. It is simply an additional or alternative title for the head of the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church, with no canonical consequences.
I dare say, that the Syro-Malandkans involved see it differently. [...]
When His Beatitude Moran Mor Baselios Cleemis was elected in 2007, [visnews-en.blogspot.no] he was careful to ask for and receive confirmation of his election from Pope Benedict, rather than "ecclesiastical communion" which is only granted to an Eastern Catholic patriarch. The same was true when His Beatitude Sviatoslav was elected in 2011. [visnews-en.blogspot.no] Whether or not one likes it, this is the current reality. But we can hope and pray for better things to come, as both the Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church and the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church continue to deepen and develop their true identities as Eastern Catholic churches in their own right.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Roman Interloper
...I have to say, as amazing as the exterior looks, the interior is distinctly un-amazing. The iconostasis (such as it is) is particularly surprising. I trust that what one sees in these images are the unfinished "before" shots and not the all-done "after" shots.

The cathedral will be consecrated this August 18 even though the interior of the cathedral will not be finished. (Source [risu.org.ua])
I do remember seeing an image of how the sanctuary is to look like when completed. I believe I saw it when then-Patriarch Huasr was visiting LA to raise funds for the cathedral. It looked modern and had a large image of Christ resurrected which was in the western style.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by griego catolico
Originally Posted by Roman Interloper
...I have to say, as amazing as the exterior looks, the interior is distinctly un-amazing. The iconostasis (such as it is) is particularly surprising. I trust that what one sees in these images are the unfinished "before" shots and not the all-done "after" shots.

The cathedral will be consecrated this August 18 even though the interior of the cathedral will not be finished. (Source [risu.org.ua])
I do remember seeing an image of how the sanctuary is to look like when completed. I believe I saw it when then-Patriarch Huasr was visiting LA to raise funds for the cathedral. It looked modern and had a large image of Christ resurrected which was in the western style.
eeek!

IAlmisry #393407 04/17/13 05:12 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Originally Posted by IAlmisry
Originally Posted by griego catolico
Originally Posted by Roman Interloper
...I have to say, as amazing as the exterior looks, the interior is distinctly un-amazing. The iconostasis (such as it is) is particularly surprising. I trust that what one sees in these images are the unfinished "before" shots and not the all-done "after" shots.

The cathedral will be consecrated this August 18 even though the interior of the cathedral will not be finished. (Source [risu.org.ua])
I do remember seeing an image of how the sanctuary is to look like when completed. I believe I saw it when then-Patriarch Huasr was visiting LA to raise funds for the cathedral. It looked modern and had a large image of Christ resurrected which was in the western style.
eeek!


That is disappointing. Where I live the local UGCC and BCC church buildings are of a traditional, eastern design including the iconography. Like the Russicom in Rome, in all visual respects they could be Orthodox sanctuaries. St. Elias in Brampton, Ontario comes to mind as well. Why move to Kiev and build a Latinized, modern style building except to appear not to be Orthodox? Didn't Vatican 2 call upon the Eastern Churches to return to a more traditional eastern norm? It surely makes the "Orthodox in union with Rome" argument appear somewhat hollow to say the least. Stuff like that sends a signal to the Orthodox world which only reinforces its deeply held fears about rapprochement with Rome. I don't get it. If one wants to be "like" the Romans why not just join them? It certainly makes the parishes and priests here in the USA and Canada who have seriously Easternized their liturgical and pietetical practices either look foolish or leaves them out there in the rain so to speak. Please excuse my carrying on, but the picture and description of the new church set me off,

DMD #393410 04/17/13 06:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by DMD
Why move to Kiev and build a Latinized, modern style building except to appear not to be Orthodox? Didn't Vatican 2 call upon the Eastern Churches to return to a more traditional eastern norm? It surely makes the "Orthodox in union with Rome" argument appear somewhat hollow to say the least. Stuff like that sends a signal to the Orthodox world which only reinforces its deeply held fears about rapprochement with Rome.
Perhaps the hand has been tipped.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
S
Member
Member
S Offline
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 3
I take it none of you bothered to look at the proposed design for the new Russian Orthodox cathedral in Paris? And I could point you to any number of Orthodox churches in this country (not to mention Western Europe) that push the boundaries of taste and tradition alike. Bad architecture knows no confessional boundaries.

StuartK #393426 04/18/13 06:51 AM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Originally Posted by StuartK
I take it none of you bothered to look at the proposed design for the new Russian Orthodox cathedral in Paris? And I could point you to any number of Orthodox churches in this country (not to mention Western Europe) that push the boundaries of taste and tradition alike. Bad architecture knows no confessional boundaries.

Agreed, but bad acts by your neighbor don't justify bad acts by you.

DMD #393428 04/18/13 07:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by DMD
Originally Posted by StuartK
I take it none of you bothered to look at the proposed design for the new Russian Orthodox cathedral in Paris? And I could point you to any number of Orthodox churches in this country (not to mention Western Europe) that push the boundaries of taste and tradition alike. Bad architecture knows no confessional boundaries.

Agreed, but bad acts by your neighbor don't justify bad acts by you.
Indeed, but more importantly, the Russians aren't claiming to come home in Paris.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
A
Member
Member
A Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 8
I enjoyed watching the enthronement of Major Archbishop Sviatoslav, but I have to admit that the Moscow Patriarchate does a better job when it comes to celebrating the liturgy than the UGCC. No offense intended.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
It's been eight years since I saw what appeared to be the planned interior of the patriarchal cathedral. The plans reminded me of the sanctuary [suburbangrandma.com] of Immaculate Conception UC Cathedral in Philadelphia, PA with its arched iconostasis and large mosaic.

What surprised me though was that the mosaic had the more western depiction of the resurrected Christ like this [1.bp.blogspot.com].

I was able to find this image [kyivsobor.ugcc.org.ua] of the planned interior from the patriarchal cathedral website [kyivsobor.ugcc.org.ua]. The arched iconostasis is present but without the large mosaic. The plans my have changed. It appears the sanctuary wall will have stained glass windows instead.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
^The links to the cathedral website dont work.

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
D
DMD Offline
Member
Member
D Offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,953
Originally Posted by Apotheoun
I enjoyed watching the enthronement of Major Archbishop Sviatoslav, but I have to admit that the Moscow Patriarchate does a better job when it comes to celebrating the liturgy than the UGCC. No offense intended.

A Greek priest once commented to me that in heaven the western Masters of Ceremony would come from High Church Anglicans and the eastern ones would come from the Moscow Patriarchate! smile

DMD #393435 04/18/13 11:37 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
G
Member
Member
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by DMD
^The links to the cathedral website dont work.

They are working now.

Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Moderator
Member
Moderator
Member
Joined: Aug 1998
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 24
Originally Posted by Apotheoun
I enjoyed watching the enthronement of Major Archbishop Sviatoslav, but I have to admit that the Moscow Patriarchate does a better job when it comes to celebrating the liturgy than the UGCC. No offense intended.

To each his own, I find MP liturgies over-choreographed.


My cromulent posts embiggen this forum.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
I
Member
Member
I Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 839
Originally Posted by Fr. Deacon Lance
Originally Posted by Apotheoun
I enjoyed watching the enthronement of Major Archbishop Sviatoslav, but I have to admit that the Moscow Patriarchate does a better job when it comes to celebrating the liturgy than the UGCC. No offense intended.

To each his own, I find MP liturgies over-choreographed.
I'm not much for the overly operatic stuff, but I much prefer, for instance, the change of the Church in the middle of Vesperal Divine Liturgy Great and Holy Saturday. It makes the Antioch use for Pascha seem subdued.

Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Irish Melkite, theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0