Peter - you Rock!
Very good! RC's often have that problem. A rite can be shared (albeit with local variations) by several Particular Eastern Catholic Churches.
The Society of Sts Peter and Andrew needs to divest itself of that apparent issue asap.
In addition, a "rite" can have both Julian and Gregorian calendars (just as the UGCC "rite" has).
And not all parishes within a given "rite"
would venerate the same saints either.
I know UGCC parishes who venerate and have on their walls very many Orthodox Saints which they've taken directly from the Orthodox calendar without paying any attention as to whether Rome has officially acknowledged them or not. Then there is one UGCC that has the icon of the Pillars of Orthodoxy and one UGCC priest who wants to establish a UGCC brotherhood of St Mark of Ephesus . . .
Also, I don't know if I like the idea of "Sts Peter and Andrew" as if St Peter's influence is limited to Rome alone. St Peter established many churches throughout the East, in Antioch in particular.
It was only at Rome in the West that he was martyred with St Paul where both Apostles consecrated bishops (to add to those who were already there before them).
St Peter belongs as much to the East as St Andrew (and all the Apostles).
You tell me if I'm "rite" or not.
Alex
