The Byzantine Forum
Newest Members
PoboznyNeil, Hammerz75, SSLOBOD, Jayce, Fr. Abraham
6,185 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
3 members (Erik Jedvardsson, theophan, San Nicolas), 660 guests, and 94 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
St. Sharbel Maronite Mission El Paso
by orthodoxsinner2, September 30
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
Holy Saturday from Kirkland Lake
by Veronica.H, April 24
Byzantine Catholic Outreach of Iowa
Exterior of Holy Angels Byzantine Catholic Parish
Church of St Cyril of Turau & All Patron Saints of Belarus
Forum Statistics
Forums26
Topics35,533
Posts417,711
Members6,185
Most Online4,112
Mar 25th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#76744 01/23/02 06:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 92
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 92
I am a Byzantine Catholic, however I believe that the orthodox are correct when it comes to the teaching of the immaculate conception of Mary. To think other wise, would maker her redeemer equal to Christ. To take away her with humanity would make her a no longer human, she in fact would be a different kind. Christ had to redeem fallen humanity—how could he if Mary was already a perfect creation, she in fact would be a redeemer by her very nature since it was her that was transformed in the womb of st. ann. On the other hand, she did posses some type of gift of the Spirit that enabled her to remain pure form personal sin. I do not contend with the dogmas of my church, but I do believe that the Immaculate Conception happened when she came into union with the Holy Ghost at the annunciation. At this point she became defied, transformed into the New Eve. I do believe the reconciliation of humanity began at this point. I welcome for understanding on this topic and would also like to know if I am allowed to believe this understanding on Mary and still be apart of the Byzantine Catholic Church. Also, if I am able to approach this dogma in this fashion is there any Church documentation that declares me the permission to do so.

Thanks Broric

[ 01-23-2002: Message edited by: Broric ]

#76745 01/23/02 09:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,133
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,133
Hello:

The Catholic Church never denies the full humanity of the Mother of God, not her need for the grace of salvation in Christ.

It is precisely the grace and salvific work of Our Lord Jesus Christ the one that preserved Mary from all sin and from all stain of sin even from her conception.

God is timeless.

If you wish to believe that the Original Sin doesn't imply a "stain", you might do so, many Byzantine Catholics do. This theological opinion actually validates, more than contradicts, the dogma of the Immaculate Conception.

As someone else said in this same forum, I rather line up with those who celebrate the total holiness of the Theotokos than with those who insist in finding a trace of sin in her prior to the announciation.

Shalom,
Memo.

#76746 01/24/02 12:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Member
Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 26,405
Likes: 38
Dear Broric,

Again, this is a mistaken understanding of what the Immaculate Conception, as a doctrine, "does."

The Orthodox Church has always believed in the total holiness and sinlessness of the Mother of God. It is something that has to do with honour we give to our Incarnate Lord, rather than with the Theotokos in the first instance.

"Original Sin" was understood by the Eastern Fathers as the "consequences of Adam's sin" that we have inherited, namely, death, concupiscence etc.

Augustine believed in Original Sin as inherited guilt or as something by which we inherit Adam's sin.

But how can we share in the personal sin of another, the East would ask?

We cannot. But just as Adam's human nature, that we share with him, fell in his sin, so too that nature that is communicated to us is fallen, weak and is destined for death.

The liturgical, deuterocanonical and other tradition of the Orthodox Church has, again, always affirmed the total holiness and sinlessness of the Mother of God from the womb of St Anne which is why the "Conception of St Anne (of the Mother of God)" is even celebrated liturgically (only the feast of a saint may be celebrated) and why the Feast of the Nativity of the Mother of God is celebrated.

To those Orthodox who do not believe this, please review your rich liturgical tradition pertaining to the Mother of God and show even ONE miniscule example where it is said the Mother of God was in any kind of sin!

It would be intolerable and an offence against Christ the Incarnate God to think that His Mother, from whom He received HIs Flesh and Blood with which to save us by His Life, Death and Resurrection, could ever be said to be under the authority of satan, which she would have been had she been in sin, even for the twinkling of an eye.

"Original Sin" is no "stain" but a condition of weakness that we've inherited from Adam.

In the East, even after we've been cleansed in confession, we can still call ourselves "sinful" since that is the condition of our human nature.

Alex


Moderated by  theophan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
The Byzantine Forum provides message boards for discussions focusing on Eastern Christianity (though discussions of other topics are welcome). The views expressed herein are those of the participants and may or may not reflect the teachings of the Byzantine Catholic or any other Church. The Byzantine Forum and the www.byzcath.org site exist to help build up the Church but are unofficial, have no connection with any Church entity, and should not be looked to as a source for official information for any Church. All posts become property of byzcath.org. Contents copyright - 1996-2024 (Forum 1998-2024). All rights reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0